Processing math: 2%

Pages

News: Currently the LaTeX and hidden solutions on this blog do not work on Google Reader.
Email me if you have suggestions on how to improve this blog!

Saturday, 3 September 2011

Math GRE - #32

Let \mathbb{R} be the set of real numbers and let f and g be functions from \mathbb{R} into \mathbb{R}. Which of the following is the negation of the statement:

"For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0."

  1. For each s in \mathbb{R}, there does not exist an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0.
  2. For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)>0 and g(s)\leq0.
  3. There exists an s in \mathbb{R} such that for each r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)>0 and g(s)\leq0.
  4. There exists an s in \mathbb{R} and there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)\leq0 and g(s)\leq0.
  5. For each r in \mathbb{R}, there exists an s in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)\leq0 and g(s)\leq0.

Solution :


Choice 3 is the answer.

If you've got an innate talent for logic, you could probably tell that choice 3 is the answer after a bit of thinking. 

Another way is to use quantifiers to translate the statement into formal logic.
The statement:

"For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0."

can be translated as: \forall s\in\mathbb{R},\;\exists r\in\mathbb{R},\; f(r)>0\rightarrow g(s)>0.

We can negate this statement (imagine the negation as an arrow, flipping each quantifier as it flies past it) to be: \exists s\in\mathbb{R},\;\forall r\in\mathbb{R},\; f(r)>0\wedge g(s)\leq0.

This is choice 3 precisely.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

This webpage is LaTeX enabled. To type in-line formulae, type your stuff between two '$'. To type centred formulae, type '\[' at the beginning of your formula and '\]' at the end.