News: Currently the LaTeX and hidden solutions on this blog do not work on Google Reader. Email me if you have suggestions on how to improve this blog!
Saturday, 3 September 2011
Math GRE - #32
Let \mathbb{R} be the set of real numbers and let f and g be functions from \mathbb{R} into \mathbb{R}. Which of the following is the negation of the statement:
"For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0."
For each s in \mathbb{R}, there does not exist an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0.
For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)>0 and g(s)\leq0.
There exists an s in \mathbb{R} such that for each r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)>0 and g(s)\leq0.
There exists an s in \mathbb{R} and there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)\leq0 and g(s)\leq0.
For each r in \mathbb{R}, there exists an s in \mathbb{R} such that f(r)\leq0 and g(s)\leq0.
Solution :
Choice 3 is the answer.
If you've got an innate talent for logic, you could probably tell that choice 3 is the answer after a bit of thinking.
Another way is to use quantifiers to translate the statement into formal logic.
The statement:
"For each s in \mathbb{R}, there exists an r in \mathbb{R} such that if f(r)>0, then g(s)>0."
can be translated as: \forall s\in\mathbb{R},\;\exists r\in\mathbb{R},\; f(r)>0\rightarrow g(s)>0.
We can negate this statement (imagine the negation as an arrow, flipping each quantifier as it flies past it) to be: \exists s\in\mathbb{R},\;\forall r\in\mathbb{R},\; f(r)>0\wedge g(s)\leq0.
This is choice 3 precisely.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
This webpage is LaTeX enabled. To type in-line formulae, type your stuff between two '$'. To type centred formulae, type '\[' at the beginning of your formula and '\]' at the end.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
This webpage is LaTeX enabled. To type in-line formulae, type your stuff between two '$'. To type centred formulae, type '\[' at the beginning of your formula and '\]' at the end.
Post a Comment